Therefore, this breach of condition of policy of insurance being "fundamental breach", the insurer of the offending vehicle, cannot be compelled to indemnify the Opponent No. 2. Therefore, "to pay and ...

1. This appeal is by the Insurance company challenging the Judgment and Order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chintamani, ['Tribunal', for short] in MVC No. 19/2007.

Citation: 2024:BHC-AS:20013,MANU/MH/2853/2024. 1. The issue involved in this appeal is pay and recovery order passed by the Tribunal and contributory negligence of the deceased.

It is significant to note that the complaint was lodged by the father of the claimant on 19.1.2007 whereas the claim petition was filed by the minor claimant represented through his mother, natural ...

Second witness of the claimant is Balasaheb Bongane CW-3. He states that he was proceeding on his motorcycle and witnessed the offending jeep dashed against motor cycle of the deceased Dattarao. He ...

He has stated that the accident was due to rash and negligent driving of the car referred to above. He had not given any complaint to the police. He did not take the injured persons to the hospital.